Woman are superior than men in all abilities.
He's just getting confused with his words again. The 'inferior' in 'inferior parietal lobule' is being used in an anatomical sense, not in the way you're used to.
(See what I did there?)
The female of every species is more violent than the male of the species and therefore better at war. By "protecting" them, we prevent woman from stirring up their violent emotions and instead allow them to focus on civilizing us "barbarian" males because civilization requires peace and not war to flourish.
Since I love pointing out flaws: if women are superior to men in all abilities, and men only appear to be the more violent of the two because they 'protect' women, and that's necessary for peace, that means that men have taken over the role that women would have had if not for the fact that men have pacified them: war-making; and if this, as you say, is necessary for peace, then, for it to work, it must be the case that men are better at whatever it is you think we do to prevent the war and destruction that you seem to think is inevitable (or more likely) in a matriarchal society, in the usurped role of war-maker.
Logic time (my favourite!):
The female of every species is more violent than the male of the species and therefore better at war.
Females of a species are more violent than the males of that species.
(Those who are more violent are better at war.) [Suppressed premise]
Therefore, females are better at war.
Completely valid; well done. Unfortunately, whatever you may think about the first premise, equating the notion of violence with aptitude in waging war is erroneous, since it's not necessarily true that a more violent person is more capable in waging war than his/her less violent counterpart; therefore
, the truth of your conclusion (that women are superior to men at war-making) does not follow from the fact that women are more violent than men, whether they are or not.
Lastly, I'm surprised that a learned Christian scholar such as yourself does not think that men are superior to women, and that you're asking a woman to give her opinion and, so, to teach, since, I would imagine, it is right and prudent for the superior of the two to rule, and I'm sure you're familiar with Corinthians, which says,
"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." (I Corinthians 11:3)
"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9)
as well as with the first book of Timothy, which says,
"Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14).
And she wasn't even the female with whom I have a telepathic relationship.